« FREE Movie: The Great Global Warming Swindle | Main | Al Gore: Always A Bridesmaid But Never A Bride »

17,000 Scientist Disagree

Letter from Frederick Seitz

http://www.oism.org/pproject/

Research Review of Global Warming Evidence
Below is an eight page review of information on the subject of "global warming," and a petition in the form of a reply card. Please consider these materials carefully.

The United States is very close to adopting an international agreement that would ration the use of energy and of technologies that depend upon coal, oil, and natural gas and some other organic compounds.

This treaty is, in our opinion, based upon flawed ideas. Research data on climate change do not show that human use of hydrocarbons is harmful. To the contrary, there is good evidence that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is environmentally helpful.

The proposed agreement would have very negative effects upon the technology of nations throughout the world, especially those that are currently attempting to lift from poverty and provide opportunities to the over 4 billion people in technologically underdeveloped countries.

It is especially important for America to hear from its citizens who have the training necessary to evaluate the relevant data and offer sound advice.

We urge you to sign and return the petition card. If you would like more cards for use by your colleagues, these will be sent.

Frederick Seitz
Past President, National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A.
President Emeritus, Rockefeller University

Paper: Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide

Comments (14)

Thanks for creating this great website and exposing the greatest hoax ever.
Let's not forget the nearly 100 million people who have died due to the banning of the very benign chemical DDT. It was nanny liberals that accomplished that carnage and it's nanny liberals that will cause even greater harm if they get their way on fighting so called global warming.

Trace:

I respect your site and all...but you are aware that with the increase in temperature our resources will disappear? And not to mention, some animals around the world base their exisistance upon and continuous climate? Not to say the theory your site is based around isn't agreeable, I'm just saying...global warming is something that people should consider as a possible threat to the enviourment. I mean, it's not something that should be a cause of paranoia throughout the world, but we should be aware of it and take precautions.
-Trace

Will Stegter is saying that the Polar Bear population is shrinking, but in some places they're thriving.
http://www.nunatsiaq.com/news/nunavut/70202_01.html

Steve Gutzmann:

Thanks for doing this, It's about time someone takes on these "NUT JOBS".

I hear some of the opinions hear but for people who say things like "trace" I get really rankled when they give out knee jerk ideas as if they are true with little or no basis for any of it.

the sun=energy=warmth, absence of solar energy=cold=void=death

I really find it perplexing that people say greater warmth on this planet is a bad thing when the Sun (created by God) provides us energy and life. It isn't a "general threat" anymore then water might be.
As for this statement" some animals around the world base their exisistance upon and continuous climate?"

I don't understand it, nor were any animal species listed as such or how they'd be affected by warming the earth by 0.5 degrees?

Laurie:

Remember the 70's? We were all going to freeze to death. Of course it's warmer. There are more windbags trying to get their piece of the pie!!

Laurie:

Remember the 70's? We were all going to freeze to death. Of course it's warmer. There are more windbags trying to get their piece of the pie!!

Ken:

Hooray for Minnesotans. Thanks for the great website. Global warming, my achin' heiny!!.

Trace, Believe it or not, animals as created by God (remember Him?) adapt very readily to changing environments. (.5Deg?) They grow thicker fur, they shed, they move North or South. We are almost as responsible for so called climate change as we are for the Mt St Helens eruption. The climates are cyclical, and historically they run about a 25 to 30 year course. We are already seeing that GW is dropping in the last year, so Al Gore will be proved very very wrong in the next 5 years.
Better invest in thinsulate and thermal underwear. It's gonna get cold in Houston.
Don't know if you are female or meterosexual, but anybody over the age of 12 and is either female or has to live with one, must surely understand 'cycles'.
Get a life.

ac2:

It's about time we have a site like this!! :) Stand up and speak out against this nonsense!!

Thanks to whoever set this up!

Jeff:

I don't understand why so many people don't open their eyes. All you people referencing God. Ken, are you saying that since Jesus doesn't mention our impact on global warming in the bible that means it does not exist? Remember, God created all things. He created us as free and analytial thinkers in his image. We created the problems like coal power plants that dump CO2 and mercury in the air. I am a Minnesotan too, and am sick of the DNR telling my how many fish I shouldn't eat because they are poisoned with mercury. I guess God created that problem too?

As with the natural global temerature swing: You know when a pendulum in a clock swings, it goes to about the same position on either side consistently. If our climate did that, this wouldn't be an issue. The fact is that the swing is way out of balance the last 50 years. We are having a negative impact, quit complaining about it and do something!

As for this article above, I googled the autor Frederick Seitz, and this is the first page that popped up. What a fraud!

http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Seitz_Tobacco_Crimes.html

So your point is: if man emits CO2 its bad, but if nature makes CO2 its good? Whales emit more CO2 than coal fired plants, should we kill them? There are 7 million acres of peat bogs in Minnesota emitting way more CO2 than us Minnesotans, should we develop them?

Explain tropical vegation in Antarctica and Glaciers in Minnesota. Talk about Swinging Pendulums.

We can agree that Mecury is bad, so why are they making us buy light bulbs WITH MERCURY!

And Oh Yeah, Frederick Seitz has come up with other peer reviewed studies that disprove the Liberal Agenda.

Jeff:

Whales, peat bogs, and other natural things are...well, natural.

Fredreick Seitz has come up with a lot of peer reviewed studies....and I am sure none of them made him tons of money because they benefitted his employer at the time.

Do you think Al Gore is making any money?
He just happens to own a carbon offset company.
(which uses the Enron model of carbon offsetting by the way)

Don't you fellas realize that since you aren't in Hollywood--where the effects of global warming are realized daily (look at all the hot air there)--that all you facts don't mean anything to all the "enlightened ones?"

Fight the good fight, brothers. I was skeptical until I saw the BBC documentary, now I've researched it more on my own. I can't wait till 2030 when it's going to be global cooling again. Al Gore is a fascist.

Post a comment

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on October 7, 2007 3:56 PM.

The previous post in this blog was FREE Movie: The Great Global Warming Swindle .

The next post in this blog is Al Gore: Always A Bridesmaid But Never A Bride.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.





Powered by
Movable Type 3.35